Theoretical Frameworks for Hookup Analysis
An interdisciplinary biopsychosocial model can synthesize usually disconnected theoretical perspectives and offer a more holistic understanding of hookup culture. Hatfield et al. (in press) declare that
Even though many scholars stress social facets yet others stress evolutionary facets, increasingly most have a cultural and biopsychosocial approach—pointing out that this is the discussion of tradition, social context, individual experience, and biological factors that shape young people’s attitudes and willingness to be involved in casual intimate encounters. Which of the facets end up being most critical is dependent on tradition, character, sex, and social context. (pp. 3– 4)
Some empirical studies of hookup behavior also have advocated approaches that are multifactorialEshbaugh & Gute, 2008; Garcia & Reiber, 2008).
Using two midlevel theories, Fisher et al. (2012) explained that “parental investment concept is a typical example of an ultimate degree of description, while social part concept is a good example of a level that is proximate although each contributes to exactly the same prediction” (p. 47). They argued that development could be many useful in examining the reproductive motive, and intimate scripts might be beneficial in examining the discourse agenda that is cultural. This is certainly, evolutionary biology influences why rising grownups participate in uncommitted intercourse and also the means teenage boys and women respond to these encounters (ultimate level explanations). During the time that is same social functions and sexual scripts influence how emerging grownups navigate their desires in a specific socio-cultural context (proximate degree explanations).